Discussion in 'Announcements & Rules' started by Garnet, Dec 20, 2017.
Holy shit this man has just ascended grammar.
Actually I have an argument, can you name once in the past month where GB was underperforming against rangers? In fact we usually work together, not against so that's not even an argument. People don't like GB in AFG simply because of the kidnap role-play. Which is silly.
they don't ignore their problems so that's a dub in my opinion
Yea but im a 1SG in the GB you think that easy to get. No plus im on 6-8 hours a day. I know what Im talking about. Use to be in rangers. They never talked., very little communication. GB comes out top. Plus why do you think GB has more people because they want to join the better team.
You are new. I just looked up your playtime and you have 70 hours. And we are not talking about merging factions, we are voting on one to remove. Like I said before, just because you do better in wars doesn't mean you should stay.
He still has a say in what happens to his faction
All of those making arguments that "our factions has more and better players" is redundant and quite useless. Either way, the faction that gets removed will have its players transferred to the one that survived, so the standing faction will get the players from the so-called "better" faction. At this point, the only argument should be: Which faction has cooler lore or works best for the way the server is setup?
The reason why we have less people in Rangers because our tryouts are hard and a lot of people don't get in. And they are harder than GB.
Sorry to tell you this but hostages aren't an active situation 24/7. Therefore a lot of the time they will do nothing. Just like sniping and direct action. There needs to be something going on with all factions 24/7 and this new map will create that, though for right now, this won't happen.
How many people are in Rangers not many. Its all about who does better in war, you dont want a bottom faction to push ahead.
I'm tired of your BS... He's been here for a month. He has a say in this... stop trying to suppress what he has to say just because he's "new". You were new at one time and no one suppressed you
Well real life wise, Green Beret are still in Afghanistan, with a member recently being killed in combat.
Stop making silly arguments like "MORE WORK FOR GARNET". I am not taking any part of this besides erasing the code for one faction.
Think about which faction you like better... whether its be its name or "LORE" - because at the end of the day, the only thing that will change for the guys in GB/Rangers is possibly the name of your faction.
Stop questioning which one is currently ran better, that's ENTIRELY irrelevant.
GB Have the hardest training other than Delta Force, Rangers are a step down from GB. The only reason we are having this is because Rangers try and do the same thing, They should stick to what they do IRL.
You're missing the point. There's less rangers because their tryouts are much harder and less frequent than GB tryouts. They have more skilled players, and just because they go to different locations than you in wars doesn't mean they are less skilled. From my 5 months of being on the server, from an Afghan standpoint, Rangers have always had the more skilled players. Besides that, Rangers should stay simply because their lore makes more sense with the map. It's not a matter of "who's better", it's what faction makes more sense, like Garnet said above.
dawg... might be time to hang back a bit.
Gernet It would solve all of this, if rangers did there job and not an try and do GB jobs.
Separate names with a comma.