Before I begin, this is in no-way trying to target anyone especially Conway. Keep that in mind as you read. So from what I'm hearing is all this about Conway having FULL control over literally everything and how the Ranger and GB faction leaders have no power for anything really since it can get overturned by Conway. Anyways, so Conway rules USASOC as well as the Army. Which makes sense since he's a GA so yes he should have full reign. It's almost as if this was suggested by someone before for the ENTIRE US (me with the Chiefs of Staff). The original Chiefs were to counter-act each other to prevent things like this from happening but instead you've not only you went along with the idea, but you did it terribly. In which I mean that you have one person who pretty much rules everything on a faction level (which wasn't suppose to happen with the chiefs since there was 3 of them). You called out my suggestion for the chiefs of staff as a power struggle but yet you put one person in charge? Literally just caused a problem for yourselves really. So morale of the story, be careful what you agree with because since the meeting, you played yourselves and you can't blame anyone but yourselves in this occasion. But why does it matter to me? I might be banned but I after all this time this by far is the more retarded thing anyone has ever agreed with. Like worse than Burton running Rangers and redcrypt joining SAS as a LtGen. LolXD. Feel free to post but I might not respond.